A Pattern for Successful Online Corporate Apologies: Analyzing Iranian Customer Complaints and Corporate Apologies on Platform X

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Media Management, Alborz Campus, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Objective: Social media has made even the largest corporations vulnerable to negative feedback and word-of-mouth effects. Companies face crises such as branding mistakes, competitor defamation, human errors, and product failures, all of which can erode customer trust and damage brand reputation. Ineffective crisis management may lead to scandals and brand failure. Given the significant impact of brand reputation on customer loyalty, companies must adopt effective crisis response strategies. One such strategy is corporate online apologies, which play a crucial role in customer retention and brand reputation recovery. However, many Iranian companies exhibit weak performance in addressing customer complaints on social media and, at times, exacerbate brand damage by ignoring negative feedback. This study aims to develop a pattern for successful corporate online apologies in the Iranian market, with a particular focus on Platform X.
 
Research Methodology: This research employed a grounded theory approach to develop a pattern for successful online corporate apologies. The grounded theory method was selected due to its systematic data collection, which allows for the development of theories based on data rather than existing hypotheses. This approach is exploratory, arising from the data obtained, and is rooted in the interpretive paradigm. Given the absence of a native model, framework, or pattern for successful corporate apologies in Iran, the use of grounded theory is justified for this research. The interpretive philosophy serves as the foundation, while a pragmatic philosophy, emphasizing practical application, was also applied due to the mixed-method approach used for data collection and analysis.
This study followed a case study approach, examining the apology strategies of 20 Iranian brands in response to customer complaints on Platform X. Customer complaints related to service or product failures, along with the corresponding corporate apologies published on the brands' official accounts, were extracted using Bluestacks software. This extraction was based on four predefined keywords related to apologies. The collected X threads were then coded and analyzed using MAXQDA software.
Thematic analysis was used to identify, analyze, and report patterns within the large volumes of collected textual data.
 
Findings: The analysis of qualitative and quantitative data, along with the interpretation of extracted themes, led to the development of a pattern for successful corporate online apologies tailored to the Iranian market. This framework aims to provide insights into effective apology strategies in brand-consumer interactions and help Iranian brands regain customer trust, preserve their reputation, and foster long-term customer loyalty.
 
Discussion & Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, it is essential for Iranian brands and companies to adopt an online apology management approach characterized by a friendly tone, explicit apology and regret statements, practical solutions, and compensation measures. Companies, at the initial stage of posting apologies, need first to adopt an appropriate (friendly) tone and establish direct communication with customers (e.g., greeting, using the customer's name or username, tagging their username). Then, they should explicitly apologize or express regret (or both) using keywords like "apology," "sorry," "regret," and "we apologize" for the issue at hand, clearly acknowledging responsibility without making excuses. In the next step, companies should aim to understand the cause of the complaints by requesting additional information from customers about the problem. They should also provide the dissatisfied customers with necessary guidance before referring them to the support unit, so they can resolve the issue independently through the established communication on Platform X. Afterward, companies must begin addressing the problem and show their commitment by promising follow-up actions. At this stage, companies should update customers on the progress of resolving the complaint and, if needed, collect details such as email, contact numbers, or usernames to extend the communication beyond Platform X and refer customers to the support unit. In the next step, if necessary, companies should clearly inform customers about how the compensation for the inconvenience will be handled. To foster and strengthen positive emotional connections, increase trust, and enhance the brand's credibility while reducing customer dissatisfaction, it is recommended that companies end their apology by thanking the customer for their patience, expressing hope for resolving the issue, showing empathy, and expressing willingness to provide better services in the future. The use of various emojis at all stages of an apology can help companies enhance their communication with customers and express empathy, respect, gratitude, and reinforce a sense of sincerity.

Keywords

Main Subjects


 
References
Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of marketing research, 34(3), 347-356.
Abdollahi, M., Akbari, M. & Esmaeilpour, R. (2019). An empirical study on the impact of response strategies and corporate reputation on purchase intention and negative word-of-mouth during product failure. Modern Marketing Research, 9(2), 31-52. (in Persian)
Abedi Jafari, H., Taslimi, M. S., Faghihi, A. & Sheikhzadeh, M. (2011). Thematic analysis and thematic network: A simple and effective method for explaining existing patterns in qualitative data. Strategic Management Thinking (Andisheh Modiriat), 5(2), 151-198.
(in Persian)
Akbari Araei, M., Nikkhah, R. & Jafarzadeh, S. (2020). Apology as a means of moral compensation in civil liability. Judiciary Law Journal, 84(109), 251-270. (in Persian)
Benoit, W.L. (1997). Image Repair Discourse and Crisis Communication. Public Relations Review, 23, 177-186.
Benoit, W.L. (2008). Image restoration theory. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. Wiley Online Library.
Benoit, W.L. (2014). Accounts, Excuses, and Apologies: Image Repair Theory and Research. State University of New York, NY Press: Albany, New York, NY.
Benoit, W. (1995). Accounts, Excuses and Apologies: A Theory of Image Restoration Strategies. State University of New York Press, New York.
Coombs, W. T. (1995). Choosing the right words: The Development of Guidelines for the Selection of the “Appropriate” Crisis-Response Strategies. Management Communication Quarterly, 8(4), 447–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318995008004003
Coombs, W. T. & Holladay, S. J. (2008). Comparing apology to equivalent crisis response strategies: Clarifying apology’s role and value in crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 34(3), 252–257.
Coombs, W. T. & Holladay, S. J. (2012). Amazon.com’s Orwellian nightmare: Exploring apology in an online environment. Journal of Communication Management, 16(3), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632541211245758
Coombs, W. T. & Holladay, S. J. (1996). Communication and attributions in a crisis: An experimental study of crisis communication, Journal of Public Relations Research, 8, 279-295.
Coombs, W. T., and Holladay, S. J. (2002). Helping crisis managers protect reputational assets: Initial tests of the situational crisis communication theory, Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 165-186.
Davidow, M. (2003). Organizational Responses to Customer Complaints: What Works and What Doesn’t. Journal of Service Research, 5(3), 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670502238917.
Deutschmann, M. (2003). On British English, JACET bulletin. Available at: http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110003814541/en/.
Einwiller, S. A. & Steilen, S. (2015). Handling complaints on social network sites–An analysis of complaints and complaint responses on Facebook and Twitter pages of large US companies. Public relations review, 41(2), 195-204.
Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of consumer research, 24(4), 343-373.
Gong, Y., Schroeder, A. & Pennington-Gray, L. (2022). Social media responses to service failure in the airline industry: Incorporating textual content with emojis.
Heider, F., 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Wiley, New York. DOI: 10.1037/10628-000
Khanifar, H. & Moslemi, N. (2022). Principles and foundations of qualitative research methods; new and practical approaches, Vol. 1 (5th ed.). Negah Danesh Publications. (in Persian)
Kim, S. J., Wang, R. J. H., Maslowska, E. & Malthouse, E. C. (2016). Understanding a fury in your words”: The effects of posting and viewing electronic negative word-of-mouth on purchase behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 511-521.
Kuckartz, U. & Rädiker, S. (2019). Analyzing qualitative data with MAXQDA: Text, audio, and video. Springer.
Lutzky, U. (2021). You keep saying you are sorry. Exploring the use of sorry in customer communication on Twitter. Discourse, Context & Media, 39, 100463.
Page, R. (2014). Saying ‘sorry’: Corporate apologies posted on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics, 62, 30–45.
Rahmani, H. (2020). A study on political apologies in Iran. Linguistic Research Journal, 12(1), 217-238. (in Persian)
Rasouli, S. N. & Rostegar, A. (2017). Officials and increasing public satisfaction during crises. Crisis Management and Emergency Situations Quarterly, 9(33), 75-101. (in Persian)
Rezaei, H. (2020). Apology or no apology: A cross-disciplinary approach to analyzing official apologies in Iranian media. Linguistic Research (Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran), 11(2), 73-95. (in Persian)
Saadipour, E. (2021). Research methods in psychology and educational sciences: Vol. 2 (3rd ed.). Tehran: Douran Publishing. (in Persian)
Saremi, S., Esmaeili, R. & Taghipour, F. (2022). Developing a media strategy for crisis management in aviation accidents. Aviation Engineering Research Journal, 24(1), 111-140. (in Persian)
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research Methods for Business Students (8th ed.). (in Persian)
Shao, W., Moffett, J. W., Quach, S., Surachartkumtonkun, J., Thaichon, P., Weaven, S. K. & Palmatier, R. W. (2022). Toward a theory of corporate apology: mechanisms, contingencies, and strategies. European Journal of Marketing, 56(12), 3418–3452. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2021-0069
Sheibani Moghaddam, N. (2022). Examining brand mistakes on consumer behavior using experimental studies. Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran. (in Persian)
Tereszkiewicz, A. (2020). Complaint management on Twitter–evolution of interactional patterns on Polish corporate profiles. Pragmatics, 30(3), 405–430.
Van Hooijdonk, C. & Liebrecht, C. (2021). Sorry but no sorry: The use and effects of apologies in airline webcare responses to NeWOM messages of flight passengers. Discourse, Context and Media, 40, 100442.
Wang, K. Y., Chih, W. H. & Honora, A. (2023). How the emoji use in apology messages influences customers’ responses in online service recoveries: The moderating role of communication style. International Journal of Information Management, 69, 102618.
Weiner, B. (1985). "Spontaneous" causal thinking. Psychological bulletin, 97(1), 74.
Weitzl, W. & Hutzinger, C. (2017). The effects of marketer-and advocate-initiated online service recovery responses on silent bystanders. Journal of Business Research, 80, 164-175.
Yang, K. (2023). How sajiao (playing cute) wins forgiveness: The effectiveness of emojis in rebuilding trust through apology. Discourse & Communication, 17(1), 77-95.