From Virtual Influencers to Purchase Decision: The Mediating Role of Parasocial Interactions and the Moderating Role of Impulsivity

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 MSc., Department of Management, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Prof., Department of Management, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Ph.D., Department of Management, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Objective
The rapid evolution of digital marketing ecosystems has significantly reshaped the dynamics of brand–consumer interactions, particularly within social media environments. Among the most recent developments in this domain is the emergence of virtual influencers—digitally created personas designed to simulate human-like interaction, promote brands, and engage audiences through algorithmically curated content. Unlike human influencers, virtual influencers are fully controllable, strategically branded, and technologically mediated entities capable of delivering consistent messaging, personalization, and aesthetic coherence. As their commercial adoption accelerates, understanding the psychological mechanisms through which they influence consumer behavior has become increasingly important. While existing research has examined influencer marketing broadly, limited empirical attention has been devoted to clarifying how specific virtual influencer attributes translate into purchase-related outcomes. In particular, the relational and affective mechanisms underlying this influence remain underexplored. Parasocial interaction theory suggests that consumers may develop quasi-relational bonds with mediated personas, including virtual influencers. However, it is not yet fully understood whether such parasocial engagement mediates the effect of influencer characteristics on purchase intention, nor whether individual personality traits alter this relationship.
Accordingly, the present study investigates the influence of virtual influencer characteristics—credibility, entertainment value, customization, and similarity—on consumers’ purchase intention. The study examines parasocial interactions as a mediating mechanism linking influencer attributes to behavioral intention. Furthermore, it evaluates impulsiveness as a moderating variable that may strengthen the relationship between parasocial interactions and purchase intention. By integrating parasocial theory with consumer behavior perspectives, this research seeks to provide a more nuanced understanding of how relational and dispositional mechanisms jointly shape purchase intention in virtual influencer marketing contexts.
Research Methodology
This study employed quantitative, cross-sectional research design. Data were collected from 400 active social media users within the Iranian context who had been exposed to virtual influencer content across domestic and international platforms. Participants were selected using a non-probability sampling approach and completed an online questionnaire measuring perceptions of virtual influencer attributes, parasocial interactions, impulsivity, and purchase intention. The survey instrument consisted of 40 items operationalizing the study’s constructions. Virtual influencer characteristics were measured across four dimensions: credibility, entertainment value, customization, and perceived similarity. Parasocial interactions were conceptualized as the degree of emotional and psychological engagement users experience with virtual influencer personas. Impulsivity was measured as a dispositional tendency reflecting spontaneous and unplanned behavioral inclinations. Purchase intention captured respondents’ likelihood of purchasing products promoted by virtual influencers.
The measurement model was assessed for reliability and validity. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha and composite reliability. Construct and convergent validity were examined through confirmatory factor analysis, including assessment of factor loadings and average variance extracted (AVE). Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using AMOS was employed to test hypothesized relationships. Model fit was evaluated using χ²/df, Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI), and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA). Mediation effects were examined using bootstrapping with 2000 resamples, enabling robust estimation of indirect effects. The moderating effect of impulsivity was tested through interaction analysis within the SEM framework.
 
Findings
The measurement model demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity, with all constructs meeting recommended thresholds for internal consistency and convergent validity. Model fit indices indicated an acceptable fit between the proposed structural model and the observed data, confirming the adequacy of the model specification. Structural analysis revealed differentiated effects of virtual influencer attributes on purchase intention and parasocial interactions. Credibility and entertainment value exerted significant positive direct effects on purchase intention, suggesting that perceived trustworthiness and engaging content can independently stimulate behavioral intention. In contrast, customization and similarity did not demonstrate significant direct effects on purchase intention. Mediation analysis revealed distinct patterns. Parasocial interactions partially mediated the effects of credibility and entertainment value on purchase intention, indicating the presence of both direct and indirect pathways. Conversely, full mediation was observed for customization and similarity, as their direct effects on purchase intention were non-significant while their indirect effects through parasocial interactions were significant. This distinction highlights that certain influencer attributes directly trigger behavioral intention, whereas others operate primarily by strengthening relational attachment. The moderating analysis demonstrated a significant interaction between impulsivity and parasocial interactions in predicting purchase intention (β = 0.12, p = 0.038). This finding indicates that the positive effect of parasocial engagement on purchase intention is amplified among consumers with higher levels of impulsivity. In other words, impulsive individuals are more likely to translate relational engagement with virtual influences into purchase-related intentions
 
Discussion & Conclusion
The findings confirm that virtual influencer characteristics influence consumer purchase intention through both direct persuasive mechanisms and relational pathways mediated by parasocial interactions. The study advances theoretical understanding by differentiating between attributes that exert immediate behavioral influence (credibility and entertainment) and those that function primarily through mediated relational engagement (customization and similarity). Furthermore, incorporating impulsiveness as a moderating variable demonstrates that the strength of parasocial influence varies across individuals, underscoring the importance of consumer heterogeneity in digital persuasion models. From a managerial standpoint, the results suggest that successful virtual influencer strategies should prioritize fostering parasocial engagement while simultaneously ensuring high levels of credibility and entertainment value. Customization and perceived similarity should be leveraged to deepen relational bonds, whereas credibility and engaging content can stimulate both direct and mediated behavioral responses. Additionally, marketing campaigns targeting segments with higher impulsivity may yield stronger purchase outcomes when parasocial engagement is effectively cultivated. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive, empirically grounded explanation of how virtual influencer attributes, parasocial interactions, and impulsivity interact to shape consumer purchase intention, contributing to a more refined understanding of relational mechanisms in contemporary digital marketing environments.

Keywords

Main Subjects


 
Appel, G., Grewal, L., Hadi, R. & Stephen, A. T. (2020). The future of social media in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing science, 48(1), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00695-1
Arsenyan, J. & Mirowska, A. (2021). Almost human? A comparative case study on the social media presence of virtual influencers. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 155, 102694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102694
Baklanov, A. (2021). Influence of the fuel distribution in double annular combustors on the emissions. Russian Engineering Research, 41, 582-585. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X21070054
Chen, J., Li, W. & Xu, H. (2025). AI-driven influencer marketing: Exploring the role of virtual personas in consumer engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 147, 107938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2025.107938 
Cooley, D. & Parks-Yancy, R. (2019). The effect of social media on perceived information credibility and decision making. Journal of Internet Commerce, 18(3), 249-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2019.1595362
DataReportal. (2025). Digital 2025: Iran. DataReportal – Global Digital Insights. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2025-iran?utm_source=chatgpt.com (assessed by 2 Jan 2026).
Davlembayeva, D. (2025). Virtual Influencers in Consumer Behaviour: A Social Influence Theory Perspective. British Journal of Management, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12839
Dondapati, S. & Dehury, A. (2024). Virtual vs. Human influencers: The battle for consumer hearts and minds. Digital Business, 4(1), 100073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2024.100073
Doroudi, H. & Mohammadi, H. (2023). Effective Factors in Users' Purchase Intention in Social Media Influencer Marketing due to Personality Characteristics; A Case study: Instagram Social Media Users in Iran. New Media Studies, 9(36), 393-349. https://doi.org/10.22054/nms.2024.71481.1503 (in Persian)
El Ashmawy, M. & El-Sahn, F. (2014). Measuring the University Students’ Attitude toward Facebook Advertising. Arab academy for science, technology and maritime transport (magistrsko delo). Dostopno prek http://macrotheme.
Gerlich, M. (2023). The Power of Virtual Influencers: Impact on Consumer Behaviour and Attitudes in the Age of AI. Administrative Sciences, 13(8), 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13080178
Ghotbifar, S., Marjani, A. & Ramazani, A. (2020). Investigating the factors influencing digital marketing effectiveness in Iran. Journal of Information Technology Management, 12(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.22059/jitm.2020.75837 
Grand view research. (2025). https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/virtual-influencer-market-report (assessed by 2 Jan 2026).
Gunawan, D. D. & Huarng, K.-H. (2015). Viral effects of social network and media on consumers’ purchase intention. Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2237-2241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.004
Gupta, R. (2025). The psychology of virtual influencer persuasion: Trust, identity, and authenticity. Journal of Digital Marketing Insights, 17(3), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1057/jdmi.2025.031 
Haghighinasab, M., MirzaeianKhamseh, P. & Soltani Tajabadi, M. (2024). The Effect of Social Media Marketing on Brand Equity with the Mediating Role of Brand Experience and Social Media Benefits. Quarterly Journal of Brand Management, 10(4), 13-66. https://doi.org/10.22051/bmr.2023.40987.2366 (in Persian)
Horton, D. & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and parasocial interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049 
Hovland, C. I. & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1086/266350
Huang, Y. & Mohamad, S. H. (2025). Examining the impact of parasocial interaction and social presence on impulsive purchase in live streaming commerce context. Frontiers in Communication, 10(Apr), 1554681. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1554681
Iran Digital Marketing Report (2022/2023). https://www.yektanet.com/dmreport1401/ (assessed by 2 Jan 2026).
Kim, H., Park, J. & Lee, I.-K. (2023). To Be or Not to Be Me? Exploration of Self-Similar Effects ofAvatars on Social Virtual Reality Experiences. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3320235
Kim, Y. & Park, J. (2024). Self-congruence and authenticity in virtual influencer marketing: Understanding consumer responses. Psychology & Marketing, 41(2), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21857 
Ko, D. W. & Park, J. (2021). I am you, you are me: game character congruence with the ideal self. Internet Research, 31(2), 613-634. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-05-2020-0294
Kumar, R., Kaushal, S. K. & Kumar, K. (2022). Does source credibility matter in promoting sustainable consumption? Developing an integrated model. Social Responsibility Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-07-2021-0257
Liu, H., Xu, J., Yu, K. & Gong, J. (2025). Bridging the virtual and real: emotional engagement in virtual influencer endorsements. Young Consumers, 26(3), 482-501. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-12-2024-2372
Liu, X. & Zheng, X. (2024). The persuasive power of social media influencers in brand credibility and purchase intention. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02512-1
Liu, Y. & Wang, X. (2025). How virtual influencers build trust and emotional connection in cross-cultural digital marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 79, 115–128.
Melnychuk, H.-A., Arasli, H. & Nevzat, R. (2024). How to engage and attract virtual influencers’ followers: a new non-human approach in the age of influencer marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 42(3), 393-417. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-06-2023-0251
Miao, F., Kozlenkova, I. V., Wang, H., Xie, T. & Palmatier, R. W. (2022). An emerging theory of avatar marketing. Journal of Marketing, 86(1), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242921996646
Mou, J. & Benyoucef, M. (2021). Consumer behavior in social commerce: Results from a meta-analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120734
Munnukka, J., Uusitalo, O. & Toivonen, H. (2016). Credibility of a peer endorser and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(3), 182-192. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-11-2014-1221
Ramezani Malabad, S. (2019). The role of content marketing in digital marketing (strategy, goal, characteristics), First National Conference on Tourism Management and Industry, Tehran, https://civilica.com/doc/1161765 (in Persian)
Rezaei, M. (2025). Examining the impact of virtual influencer credibility on impulse buying intention: Evidence from Iranian consumers. Journal of Marketing Research and Consumer Behavior, 5(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.22059/jmrcb.2025.18741 
Rodrigues, R. I., Lopes, P. & Varela, M. (2021). Factors affecting impulse buying behavior of consumers. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 697080. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697080
Rook, D. W. & Fisher, R. J. (1995). Normative Influences on Impulsive Buying Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 305-313. https://doi.org/10.1086/209452
Rostamkolaei, R. G., Benmaran, M. L. & Azad, N. (2025). Presenting an Influencer Marketing Model for Attracting Tourists in Iran's Tourism Industry. Management Strategies and Engineering Sciences, 7(3), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.61838/msesj.7.3.2
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research Methods for Business Students (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. 
Shekarchizadeh, Z. & Valikhani, Z. (2022). The Effects of Social Media Influencers on Online Purchase Intention through the Mediating Role of Attitude towards Advertising and Brand (Case of Study: Followers of Leather Clothing Pages on Instagram). New Marketing Research Journal, 11(4), 157-176. https://doi.org/10.22108/nmrj.2022.129037.2464 (in Persian)
Shirkhodaie, M., Fallah Lajimi, H., Adabi Firoozjaei, A., Khanjanzadeh Kakeroodi, N. & Nejat, S. (2022). Instagram Marketing: Choosing an Influencer for the Food Industry based on the Full Consistency Method (FUCOM). Journal of Business Management, 14(3), 495-518. https://doi.org/10.22059/jibm.2022.338396.4309 (in Persian)
Singh, A. & Patel, K. (2025). Role of virtual influencers in shaping brand engagement and consumer trust in digital economies. International Journal of Advertising, 44(2), 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2025.2412389 
Sokolova, K. & Kefi, H. (2020). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011
StatCounter. (2024). Social media market share in Iran. https://gs.statcounter.com/social-media-stats/all/iran (assessed by 2 Jan 2026).
Sutiono, H. T., Hayumurti, A. K., Tugiyo, T. & Harjanti, S. (2024). Parasocial Interaction as a Mediator: Unraveling the Influence of Social Media Influencers on Purchase Intentions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Education, 7(1), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.32535/apjme.v7i1.2937
Tarani, S. & Tarani, S. (2021). Measuring the Impact of Food Bloggers on Social Media on Users’ Attitudes and Purchase Intentions Toward Restaurant Food: A Case Study of Iranian Food Bloggers on Instagram. First National Conference on Organizational and Management Research, Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/1202233 (in Persian)
Thomas, V. L. & Fowler, K. (2021). Close encounters of the AI kind: Use of AI influencers as brand endorsers. Journal of Advertising, 50(1), 11-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1810595
Wan, A. & Jiang, M. (2023). Can virtual influencers replace human influencers in live-streaming e-commerce? An exploratory study from practitioners’ and consumers’ perspectives. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 44(3), 332-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2023.2224416
Yuan, S. & Lou, C. (2020). How social media influencers foster relationships with followers: The roles of source credibility and fairness in parasocial relationship and product interest. Journal of interactive advertising, 20(2), 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2020.1769514
Zhang, L. & Ren, J. (2022, 2022//). Virtual Influencers: The Effects of Controlling Entity, Appearance Realism and Product Type on Advertising Effect. Design, Operation and Evaluation of Mobile Communications, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05014-5_25
Zhou, X., Yan, X. & Jiang, Y. (2024). Making sense? The sensory-specific nature of virtual influencer effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 88(4), 84-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429241242698