تبیین پذیرش رسانه‌‌های اجتماعی در چارچوب مدل پذیرش فناوری: تحلیل روابط میان ادراک، نگرش و رفتار کاربران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکدۀ هنر و معماری، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران.

2 دانشیار، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکدۀ هنر و معماری، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران.

3 دانشیار، گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران.

10.22059/mmr.2026.413088.1263

چکیده

هدف: گسترش پلتفرم‌های رسانه‌های اجتماعی موجب شده است که این فناوری‌ها، به یکی از بسترهای مهم تعاملات اجتماعی و تبادل اطلاعات تبدیل شوند؛ با این حال، نحوۀ شکل‌گیری پذیرش آن‌ها از سوی کاربران، همچنان به تبیین نظری و تجربی نیازمند است. از این رو، هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی فرایند پذیرش پلتفرم‌های رسانه‌های اجتماعی، بر اساس الگوی سلسله‌مراتبی ادراک، نگرش و رفتار و تحلیل نقش مؤلفه‌های ادراکی در شکل‌گیری نگرش و قصد رفتاری کاربران است.
روش: پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر ماهیت توصیفی ـ پیمایشی با رویکرد مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری است. داده‌ها از طریق پرسش‏نامه‌ای مشتمل بر 32 گویه و بر اساس مقیاس لیکرت پنج‌درجه‌ای گردآوری شدند و با استفاده از مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری، مبتنی بر حداقل مربعات جزئی و از طریق نرم‌افزار اسمارت پی‌ال‌اس تحلیل شدند.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که ابعاد ادراک نقش معناداری در شکل‌گیری نگرش کاربران دارند. در میان آن‌ها، سودمندی ادراک‌شده و ارزش ادراک‌شده، بیشترین سهم را در تبیین ساختار ادراک ایفا می‌کنند، در حالی که سهولت استفاده ادراک‌شده و کنترل رفتاری ادراک‌شده نیز در تقویت برداشت کاربران از قابلیت استفاده از پلتفرم‌ها نقش دارند. همچنین یافته‌ها نشان داد که نگرش کاربران، به‌طور معناداری می‌تواند اعتماد به پلتفرم‌ها و ادراک هنجارهای اجتماعی مرتبط با استفاده از آن‌ها را تقویت کند و در نهایت، به افزایش قصد رفتاری برای استفاده از این فناوری منجر شود. در این چارچوب، پژوهش حاضر با تأکید بر تفکیک نظام‌مند مؤلفه‌های ادراکی، نگرشی و رفتاری و صورت‌بندی روابط میان آن‌ها در قالب یک مدل یکپارچه، به تبیین دقیق‌تر سازوکار پذیرش پلتفرم‌های رسانه‌های اجتماعی می‌پردازد.
نتیجه‌گیری: در مجموع، یافته‌ها بیانگر آن است که پذیرش پلتفرم‌های رسانه‌های اجتماعی، از یک فرایند مرحله‌ای پیروی می‌کند که در آن ادراک کاربران، زمینه‌ساز شکل‌گیری نگرش می‌شود و نگرش نیز به بروز قصد رفتاری برای استفاده از فناوری می‌انجامد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Explaining Social Media Adoption within the Technology Acceptance Model: An Analysis of the Relationships among Users’ Perception, Attitude, and Behavior

نویسندگان [English]

  • Arman Hamidi 1
  • Aliakbar Salaripour 2
  • Mehdi Hesam 3
1 PhD Candidate, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.
2 Associate Prof., Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.
3 Associate Prof., Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Objective
The expansion of information and communication technologies in recent decades, particularly the emergence and development of social media platforms, has brought about profound transformations in communication patterns, social interactions, and access to information. These platforms have gradually become one of the most important environments for interaction and communication among users and play a significant role in shaping individuals’ digital experiences and patterns of technology use. In addition to facilitating the exchange of information, social media platforms have created new opportunities for user participation, content production, and the formation of extensive social networks. Despite their rapid growth and increasing influence, understanding how users come to accept and adopt these platforms remains an important issue in studies related to technology adoption. Previous research has shown that technology adoption is not merely dependent on access to technological tools; rather, it is influenced by a range of cognitive, perceptual, and social factors. Among the most important of these factors are users’ perceptions of technological features and functions, their attitudes toward using the technology, and ultimately their behavioral intentions to adopt and use these tools. Within the theoretical framework of the Technology Acceptance Model, users’ perceptions of technological usefulness and ease of use are considered important determinants of attitudes and behavioral intentions toward technology adoption. However, many recent studies have expanded this framework by incorporating additional dimensions, such as perceived value, perceived behavioral control, perceived cost, trust, and social norms, as influential factors in the technology adoption process. Given the growing importance of social media platforms in users’ daily lives and their significant role in shaping social interactions, examining the factors influencing the acceptance of these platforms is of considerable importance. Accordingly, the present study seeks to explain the process of social media platform adoption based on an extended Technology Acceptance Model and to conceptualize this process through the relationships among perceptual dimensions, attitudes, and behavioral intentions. Furthermore, the study investigates how different perceptual components influence users’ attitudes and how these factors contribute to the formation of behavioral intention to use social media platforms.
Research Methodology
The present study is classified as an applied research study in terms of its objective and adopts a descriptive–analytical approach regarding its methodological design. The study was conducted to explain the factors influencing social media adoption and to examine the relationships among users’ perceptions, attitudes, trust, subjective norms, and behavioral intentions within the framework of an extended Technology Acceptance Model. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire designed based on the theoretical foundations of technology adoption and the variables included in the conceptual model. The questionnaire items were developed to measure users’ evaluations of social media platforms and their cognitive, attitudinal, and behavioral responses toward these technologies. Within the proposed framework, users’ perceptions were examined through five dimensions, including perceived usefulness, perceived value, perceived ease of use, perceived behavioral control, and perceived cost. In addition, attitude toward use, trust in social media platforms, subjective norms associated with their use, and behavioral intention were considered as key constructs in explaining the adoption process. Following data collection, structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to evaluate the relationships among the research variables and test the proposed conceptual model. This analytical approach enabled the simultaneous examination of the relationships among latent constructs and provided a comprehensive assessment of the mechanisms underlying social media adoption.
Findings
The findings indicated that perceptual dimensions significantly influenced users’ attitudes toward social media platforms. Among these dimensions, perceived usefulness and perceived value demonstrated stronger effects, suggesting that users primarily evaluate social media platforms based on their functional benefits and the value they obtain from using them. Perceived ease of use and perceived behavioral control also positively contributed to users’ perceptions, indicating that simplicity of use and users’ confidence in their ability to utilize these platforms are important factors in technology evaluation. In contrast, perceived cost showed a weaker influence compared with other perceptual dimensions, implying that users’ evaluations are more strongly shaped by the benefits and capabilities of social media platforms. The results further revealed that attitude was a central construct in the adoption process. Users’ attitudes toward social media platforms had significant relationships with trust, subjective norms, and behavioral intention. A more favorable attitude was associated with greater trust in these platforms and stronger perceptions of social acceptance regarding their use. Furthermore, attitude significantly influenced behavioral intention, indicating that positive evaluations of social media platforms increase users’ willingness to use them. Overall, the findings demonstrate that social media adoption is shaped through an interconnected process in which users’ cognitive evaluations of technological characteristics influence their attitudes and subsequently contribute to the formation of behavioral intentions. The results highlight the importance of considering both technological perceptions and attitudinal factors when explaining users’ adoption behavior.
Discussion & Conclusion
Overall, the findings of this study demonstrate that social media adoption can be understood as a gradual process shaped by the interaction of cognitive, perceptual, and attitudinal factors. Users’ perceptions of technological characteristics, including usefulness, value, ease of use, behavioral control, and cost, represent the initial foundation through which they evaluate social media platforms. These evaluations provide the basis for developing attitudes toward technology use and influence subsequent adoption-related decisions. The results highlight the central role of attitude in the technology adoption process. A favorable attitude toward social media platforms is associated with higher levels of trust, stronger perceptions of social acceptance, and greater behavioral intention to use these technologies. Therefore, attitude functions as an important mechanism through which users’ cognitive evaluations of technological features are translated into willingness to adopt and use social media platforms. The findings further indicate that technology adoption is not a direct outcome of technological characteristics alone; rather, it emerges through a combination of perceptual and attitudinal mechanisms. Accordingly, understanding the formation of users’ perceptions and attitudes provides a more comprehensive explanation of adoption behavior in digital environments. This perspective contributes to a deeper understanding of social media adoption by emphasizing the interconnected role of users’ cognitive evaluations, attitudes, and behavioral intentions.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Technology adoption
  • Social media platforms
  • User perception
  • User attitude
  • Behavioral intention
  • Tehran
محمدپور، صابر؛ حمیدی، آرمان؛ فریدی فشتمی، عالیه و روشن، میترا (1402). بررسی تأثیر نگرش‌های ذهنی شهروندان بر میزان استفاده از حمل‌ونقل عمومی (مطالعه موردی: کلان‌شهر تهران)، جغرافیا و توسعه فضای شهری، 10(1)، 45-65.
 
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P. & Algharabat, R. (2018). Examining factors influencing Jordanian customers’ intentions and adoption of internet banking: Extending UTAUT2 with risk. Journal of Retailing and Consumer services, 40, 125-138.
Albayati, H. (2024). Investigating undergraduate students' perceptions and awareness of using ChatGPT as a regular assistance tool: A user acceptance perspective study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100203.
Arshad, S. & Khurram, S. (2020). Can government’s presence on social media stimulate citizens’ online political participation? Investigating the influence of transparency, trust, and responsiveness. Government information quarterly, 37(3), 101486.
Atwal, G., Bryson, D. & Williams, A. (2021). An exploratory study of the adoption of artificial intelligence in Burgundy's wine industry. Strategic Change, 30(3), 299-306.
Benar, N., Fatahi Milasi, S. & Nazarian, A. (2024). The behavioral intention of coaches in virtual reality: The roles of perceived usefulness, enjoyment, performance expectancy, self-efficacy, and ease of use. Journal of New Studies in Sport Management, 5(3), 1187-1198.
Bryer, T. A. & Zavattaro, S. M. (2011). Social media and public administration: Theoretical dimensions and introduction to the symposium. Administrative theory & praxis, 33(3), 325-340.
Cabrera-Sánchez, J.-P., Villarejo-Ramos, Á. F., Liébana-Cabanillas, F. & Shaikh, A. A. (2021). Identifying relevant segments of AI Applications Adopters–Expanding the UTAUT2’s variables. Telematics and Informatics, 58, 101529.
Cugurullo, F. (2020). Urban artificial intelligence: From automation to autonomy in the smart city. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 2, 38.
Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly13(3), 319-340.
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Esfahbodi, A., Pang, G. & Peng, L. (2022). Determinants of consumers' adoption intention for blockchain technology in E-commerce. Journal of Digital Economy, 1(2), 89-101.
Fatahi Milasi, S., Benar, N. & Nazarian, A. (2026). Economic sustainability in sports ticketing: The role of technology acceptance factors and Blockchain capabilities. Journal of Advanced Sport Technology, 10(2).
Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (2011). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology press.
Granić, A. & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572-2593.
Groß, M. (2015). Mobile shopping: a classification framework and literature review. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(3), 221-241.
Gursoy, D., Chi, O. H., Lu, L. & Nunkoo, R. (2019). Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery. International journal of information management, 49, 157-169.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice19(2), 139-152.
Hamidi, A., Salaripour, A. & Hesam, M. (2026). Artificial intelligence in urban governance: examining the impact of AI adoption on citizen participation. SN Social Sciences, 6(6), 211.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43(1), 115-135.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277-319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Kelly, S., Kaye, S.-A. & Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2023). What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review. Telematics and informatics, 77, 101925.
Kesharwani, A. & Singh Bisht, S. (2012). The impact of trust and perceived risk on internet banking adoption in India: An extension of technology acceptance model. International journal of bank marketing, 30(4), 303-322.
Leesakul, N., Oostveen, A.-M., Eimontaite, I., Wilson, M. L. & Hyde, R. (2022). Workplace 4.0: Exploring the implications of technology adoption in digital manufacturing on a sustainable workforce. Sustainability, 14(6), 3311.
Lim, J. S. & Zhang, J. (2022). Adoption of AI-driven personalization in digital news platforms: An integrative model of technology acceptance and perceived contingency. Technology in Society, 69, 101965.
Luo, X., Li, H., Zhang, J. & Shim, J. P. (2010). Examining multi-dimensional trust and multi-faceted risk in initial acceptance of emerging technologies: An empirical study of mobile banking services. Decision support systems, 49(2), 222-234.
Macedo, I. M. (2017). Predicting the acceptance and use of information and communication technology by older adults: An empirical examination of the revised UTAUT2. Computers in human behavior, 75, 935-948.
Madan, R. & Ashok, M. (2023). AI adoption and diffusion in public administration: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101774.
Mohammadpour, S., Hamidi, A., Faridi Foshtomi, A. & Roshan, M. (2023). Investigating the impact of citizens’ attitudes on public transportation use (Case study: Tehran metropolis). Geography and Urban Space Development, 10(1), 45-65. doi: 10.22067/jgusd.2022.71448.1072 (in Persian)
Nazarian, A., Benar, N., Milasi, S. F. & Saeedi, F. (2025). Fostering sustainable relationships in sportswear: Insights into customer experience, social media marketing, and relationship quality. Asian Journal of Sport History & Culture, 4(2), 239-262.
Ogba-Amaugo, I. M. (2024). The use of technology in human resources management: Opportunities and challenges for organizations. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(4), 1164-1181.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization science, 11(4), 404-428.
Prislin, R. (2005). Social influence in attitude s and attitude char1ge. The handbook of attitudes, 671.
Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th). Free press.
Rondan-Cataluña, F. J., Arenas-Gaitán, J. & Ramírez-Correa, P. E. (2015). A comparison of the different versions of popular technology acceptance models: A non-linear perspective. Kybernetes, 44(5), 788-805.
Schiavo, G., Businaro, S. & Zancanaro, M. (2024). Comprehension, apprehension, and acceptance: Understanding the influence of literacy and anxiety on acceptance of artificial Intelligence. Technology in Society, 77, 102537.
Sheng, H., Nah, F. F.-H. & Siau, K. (2008). An experimental study on ubiquitous commerce adoption: Impact of personalization and privacy concerns. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(6), 1.
Sitorus, H. M., Govindaraju, R., Wiratmadja, I. I. & Sudirman, I. (2016, February). Technology adoption: an interaction perspective. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 114, No. 1, p. 012080). IOP Publishing.
Sohn, K. & Kwon, O. (2020). Technology acceptance theories and factors influencing artificial Intelligence-based intelligent products. Telematics and informatics, 47, 101324.
Taherdoost, H. (2018). A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia manufacturing, 22, 960-967.
Tang, Z., Miller, A. S., Zhou, Z. & Warkentin, M. (2021). Does government social media promote users' information security behavior towards COVID-19 scams? Cultivation effects and protective motivations. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), 101572.
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M. & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational statistics & data analysis, 48(1), 159-205.
Yuan, Y.-P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Tan, G. W.H., Cham, T. H., Ooi, K. B., Aw, E. C.-X. & Currie, W. (2023). Government digital transformation: understanding the role of government social media. Government information quarterly, 40(1), 101775.
Zavattaro, S. M. & Sementelli, A. J. (2014). A critical examination of social media adoption in government: Introducing omnipresence. Government information quarterly, 31(2), 257-264.